|
Multilateral
Agreement on Investments - MAIs
Empowerment
Communications -
with Darrell Udelhoven
The Real
Political Issues are the Issues the Corporate Media Refuse to Cover
Publisher of the Series - The Real Political Issues & People
Empowerment ©1997-2006
This
Agreement is an all out effort to further deregulate global capital
markets, and reduce the capacity of governments to enforce investment,
and finance standards; and to eliminate the enforcement by governments
of environmentally responsible behavior on the part of transnational
corporations. Where NAFTA allows countries to withdraw with six months
notice, the current draft of MAI would lock
signatories to the agreement for 20 years. You will not believe the
sovereign
legal and constitutional evolved powers that corporations have created
and
are in the process of establishing and instituting. Corporations have
unlimited
country granted incentives to move their production to specific
countries
and locales that it staggers the imagination. I will touch on some of
them
later. The corporatist media practices the sin of omission by leaving
out
nearly all of the factual realities that the global citizenry has a
disparate
need of to facilitate effective self governance. Thus the need for free
lance
journalists. Institutional credentials, not a
prerequisite—comprehensive
reality based reporting—yes, a genuine necessity.
Cumulative
Trade Deficits over the last 22 years 1974-96 have been Outrageous
According
to U.S.
Senator Paul Sarbanes: the cumulative trade deficit of the United
States, is from 1.5 trillion to 1.8 trillion depending on what factors
are used to reduce it. We were the largest creditor nation in 1981 by
1996 we were the largest debtor nation to foreign countries! Who are
the beneficiaries of
these huge trade deficits?
Giant
transnational corporations
play both ends against the middle. Only the global corporatist and the
top
tiers of the lowest production cost countries garner temporary profits,
everyone
else in this economic equation are exploited or used. The homeland
economies
of the First and Third World countries lose in numerous ways; some
become
major losers. As the Asian countries collapse financially the
taxpayers,
are going to be required to bail them out. So again, the victims bail
out
their victimizers. Will we wake up in time?
Which
Economic Model? Citizen Regulated or Corporate Controlled?
Number one:
Do you want a citizen regulated economy or; a corporate established
legal tribunal regulated economy? An economy where countries can
provide unprecedented incentives for corporations to build factories
and produce there. Where, in some countries even bribery is legal.
Where, the powerful are welcome to exploit the poorest human beings in
the poorest countries. Where the economies of all countries become
interdependent. Do you like volatility, instability, and insecurity?
Number two: Would
you rather have an economy based on regulatory incentives that would
optimize a self sustaining homeland economy while, optimizing mutually
beneficial trade. Do you want countries that build self sufficient,
self sustaining economies
from the ground up? Do you like stable and sustainable economies that
are
not critically interdependent? There is a model of capitalism that can
provide
the opportunity to achieve equity of economic opportunity within and
across
all economic sectors. Zero-sum models of capitalism can be converted to
Mutual
win/win economic relationship equations.
Unjust
Systems
Multiply Injustice Exponentially
The meeting
of the economic needs of the masses should be the primary standard of
legitimacy for all economic systems. The existing model of
capitalism does not meet those minimal criteria. There is injustice
incorporated in a multiplicity of policy components within this model
of global capitalism. Therefore, it is incumbent that we find a
model of capitalism that does meet these human requirements. I
have a clear vision of what is required but ask you to consider
alternatives that would fill the need. Consider what these mutually
beneficial changes could mean to literally billions of lives! Consider
the lives that will be spared!
Our
Global
Capitalism model is an unjust model
I have
heard the
"labor productivity, comparative advantage arguments," and they are
mere sophist
rhetoric. While labor cost differentials are critical to wages and
production
jobs in Developed Countries, the majority of production cost
differentials are in other areas. In every arena of production
costs, these developing countries have colossal advantages.
Transportation is the singular area of greater cost, but it is nominal.
The result is a noncompetitive advantage for global corporations to
produce in these countries. These unjust exploitive advantages produce
exponential spreading of gross injustice. We must care about the
marginalized people that this model of global capitalism produces. No
one should have to tell you what the consequences would be to billions
of human beings worldwide that require equity of economic opportunity.
The existing corporate model of Capitalism is on trial and the findings
require a global discussion to find the best possible model of
capitalism to adopt. If we fail to do this other countries will write
off; not just this model of capitalism but; capitalism period.
These
Corporate Agreements will compromise the Economic Opportunity of the
Majority of Humanity
There are
no more
important political issues in respect to sovereign self governance and
economic
life chances than the Multilateral Agreement on Investments. If we
allow
corporations to pass it, they will have the sovereign power to govern
countries,
and their people will be wholly subservient to corporations.
Corporations will become the New World Order reality unless, we do an
effective job of either modifying or eliminating these agreements.
How
Corporate
Institutions dictate to and Govern Countries
First, the
tremendous mobility of global corporations allows them to move into and
out of countries whenever there is an economic advantage to exploit in
another country. Second, most of these countries or communities have
over borrowed or their banks have made to many bad loans. This has left
them vulnerable to the World Bank; the IMF; and other corporate
financial institutions that then place severe policies and other
regulations on them. These regulations benefit global investors. In
this way, those countries lose their sovereignty to govern
their economic and political affairs to corporate institutions.
Therefore,
even if we were to maintain the status quo the majority of these
countries
would lose their governing rights and become corporate governed
colonies.
It is Corporate State Imperialism and Colonization at its worst;
everybody
loses in the end, including the global corporations. I refer you to a
good
dictionary; remember corporations can now transpose countries as Ruling
Collective
Imperialist Empire States.
A few
of
the MAIs'
Core Principles
- No
government
can favor domestic companies over foreign companies
- All
Governments must treat firms from all member countries equally
- No Government
can impose "performance requirements" that require companies to do
special things in order to invest
- Governments
cannot expropriate
- If
governments
violate these principles, an international tribunal can force them to
pay
damages
This is the
Defining Corporate Global Policy Agreement Issue of this Era
The
economic future
and governing sovereignty of over six billion World citizens is at
stake
in these corporate agreements. The corporate global economic policies
in
existence must be reformed if we are going to stop the exploitive
injustice that is pervasive. As things stand global financial
institutions can dictate to and govern countries, their economies and
their citizens.
Corporations
are
Suing Countries
Corporate
Rights under the Multilateral Agreement on Investments would dwarf
those of NAFTA. However, under NAFTA, the American Ethyl
Corporation filed a law suit against the Canadian government for
banning a gasoline additive that the Canadian law says is harmful.
American Ethyl has a plant in Ontario manufacturing this additive.
American Ethyl claims: Canadian law amounts to expropriation of its
property and it wants $250 million dollars compensation. Every law
imaginable will be an expropriation of corporate property and be ripe
for a huge lawsuit.
These
corporate
agreements will Establish the Corporate Rule Policy Framework for the
next Century, and perhaps the next Millennium
The vote is
due in May; it will be too late then; we need to take a hard look at
what these corporate initiated agreements are going to mean to the
average person's political and economic life chances. The evidence is
overwhelming against the existing policies that must be changed; let
alone allowing them to pass new far reaching agreements that will
create even further economic disparities.
Unbelievable
Exploitive Injustice
Injustice
and exploitation breeds rebellion. My message to all victims is to
practice total nonviolence and unite with the global citizenry that is
campaigning for
your cause. Everyone needs to begin to network through every means
possible. That includes all forms of mass media; broadcasting, print
media, audio and
video cassettes, and film. The world's citizenry must be informed and
educated
in accord with experiential realities, not propaganda.
Can
"Corporate
Rule" Be Contained?
Modified:
05/10/03
|